Moana 2 2024 - Movies (Mar 7th)
The Silent Planet 2024 - Movies (Mar 7th)
Tuesday 2024 - Movies (Mar 7th)
Plankton The Movie 2025 - Movies (Mar 7th)
CHAOS The Manson Murders 2025 - Movies (Mar 7th)
George A. Romeros Resident Evil 2025 - Movies (Mar 7th)
The Little Mermaid 2024 - Movies (Mar 7th)
Bloat 2025 - Movies (Mar 7th)
Captain America Brave New World 2025 - Movies (Mar 7th)
Confessions of a Romance Narrator 2025 - Movies (Mar 6th)
Woods of Ash 2025 - Movies (Mar 6th)
Agents 2024 - Movies (Mar 6th)
Barbie and Teresa Recipe for Friendship 2025 - Movies (Mar 6th)
Picture This 2025 - Movies (Mar 6th)
Mozarts Sister 2024 - Movies (Mar 5th)
The Road to Patagonia 2024 - Movies (Mar 5th)
Grunt 2025 - Movies (Mar 5th)
The Unbreakable Boy 2025 - Movies (Mar 4th)
The Gutter 2024 - Movies (Mar 4th)
Smile for the Dead An Examination of Spirit Photography 2025 - Movies (Mar 4th)
The Haunted the Possessed and the Damned 2024 - Movies (Mar 4th)
Moana 2 2024 - ()
The Silent Planet 2024 - ()
Tuesday 2024 - ()
Plankton The Movie 2025 - ()
CHAOS The Manson Murders 2025 - ()
George A. Romeros Resident Evil 2025 - ()
The Little Mermaid 2024 - ()
Bloat 2025 - ()
Captain America Brave New World 2025 - ()
Confessions of a Romance Narrator 2025 - ()
Woods of Ash 2025 - ()
Agents 2024 - ()
Barbie and Teresa Recipe for Friendship 2025 - ()
Picture This 2025 - ()
Mozarts Sister 2024 - ()
The Road to Patagonia 2024 - ()
Grunt 2025 - ()
The Unbreakable Boy 2025 - ()
The Gutter 2024 - ()
Smile for the Dead An Examination of Spirit Photography 2025 - ()
**True to the original, this sequel didn't deserve so much criticism and booing.** I confess that I was impressed when I realized that this film had not only been a resounding failure at the box office, but also highly criticized and vilified, both by specialized and amateur critics. I may be a little biased due to the fact that the film was part of my late childhood, but in truth I believe it was not worthy of such a beating. There are plenty of frankly worse movies out there, like the “Ted” movies or even “Minions”, that haven't met with as much outrage. However, I think everyone who has seen the film agrees on one point: it is weaker than the original film. The script picks up the story where the previous film left off: the little pig won the grand prize at the fair, became very famous and made his owner famous and happy. Despite all this, he inadvertently causes an accident that leaves his owner badly injured, and all the necessary medical care leaves him almost bankrupt. In order to prevent the farm from going to auction, Esme, his wife, decides to take the pig to a contest where she can receive a fat financial prize. For that, they have to travel by plane, but things don't go as expected, and they end lost and alone in the big city, a place where many people really don't like animals at all. Alright, the originality of the first film is gone, and the rural charm is not here. I handled it well, my concern was whether the sequel would contradict the original film or be unable to match it in quality. And the film proved to be quite solid, capable of matching its predecessor and giving us a story that follows up on previous events in a minimally credible and well-structured way. Yes, it is also a much darker film than its predecessor: the portrayal of the city is quite loaded, with the aversion to animals and the way in which they are persecuted and even killed. However, I dare to say that it corresponds to the reality, and that this film does nothing more than show that, and teach young people (the target audience of the film) to have more compassion for animals. And that, without a doubt, is a valuable message to convey. Where I think the film really failed was in the way certain details were thought through and carried out. Ferdinand, the duck, is a very nice character, but he is misused throughout the entire film, so it would have been better to do without him if it wasn't really possible to use him better. The Pitbull character, which has great relevance at one point, is discarded very early, and it could have been better to keep it a little longer, create a subplot around it, perhaps. There are, moreover, a lot of animals and a lot of attention scattered by them without much benefit for the film. The party scene, with poor Esme dressed as a clown and hanging from a chandelier, is very funny (perhaps one of the funniest) but seems to be out of line with the rest of the film. And I also cannot help but boo the way the monkeys were used: it is quite obvious that they are a representation of black people, and this is more evident by the choice of the name Thelonious (alluding to the black jazz musician Thelonious Monk) for one of them. This is just plain racism. This may not have been the intention of the producers, they may not have thought about it, but it is quite common, in racist circles, to compare black people to monkeys, and I saw this comparison in these characters. Yes, it deserves to be booed. Technically, the film matches its predecessor: the visuals are incredible, the design used for the sets and costumes is magnificent, the cinematography is superb and the work of the voice actors is simply impeccable. There are a lot of animatronic puppets here, and they're used in a believable way (if not as much as in the original movie). The human characters are frankly secondary: Cromwell is dropped, Mickey Rooney is one-dimensional and not particularly interesting. Even Magda Szubanski is underused. Faithful to the original film, the soundtrack continues to be based on themes of classical and opera music, to which, curiously, the song “Non Je ne Regrette Rien” by Edith Piaf has been added, the only song in both films that does not belong to the original film. to the conventional classical repertoire.
The little nomad girl, Nansal, finds a baby dog in the Mongolian veld, who becomes her best friend - against all rejections of her parents. A story about a Mongolian family of nomads - their traditional way of life and the rising call of the City.
In a small farming valley in Austria in the beginning of the 20th century a tyrannical farmer is found dead, and all the farmhands are relieved to be free of their tyrant. But the farmer was childless, so suddenly they all inherit the farm together. Now conflicts begin, as nobody is the boss and nobody has to obey.
Childlike Englishman, Mr. Bean, is an incompetent watchman at the Royal National Gallery. After the museum's board of directors' attempt to have him fired is blocked by the chairman, who has taken a liking to Bean, they send him to Los Angeles to act as their ambassador for the unveiling of a historic painting to humiliate him. Fooled, Mr. Bean must now successfully unveil the painting or risk his and a hapless Los Angeles curator's termination.
Shane and his mates want revenge on a local hermit who frightens them one night. Shane distracts the man while the gang carries out its plan. But who is this man ? And why does he live in the middle of nowhere ? Shane is about to learn something he won't forget.
A lonely doctor who once occupied an unusual lakeside home begins exchanging love letters with its former resident, a frustrated architect. They must try to unravel the mystery behind their extraordinary romance before it's too late.
Bruce Banner, a genetics researcher with a tragic past, suffers massive radiation exposure in his laboratory that causes him to transform into a raging green monster when he gets angry.
An itinerant farmer and his young son help a heart-of-gold saloon singer search for her estranged husband.
The creators of Wallace & Gromit bring you an exciting and original story about a group of chickens determined to fly the coop–even if they can’t fly! It’s hardly poultry in motion when Rocky attempts to teach Ginger and her feathered friends to fly…but, with teamwork, determination and a little bit o’ cluck, the fearless flock plots one last attempt in a spectacular bid for freedom.
During an historic counter-terrorism summit in Spain, the President of the United States is struck down by an assassin's bullet. Eight strangers have a perfect view of the kill, but what did they really see? As the minutes leading up to the fatal shot are replayed through the eyes of each eyewitness, the reality of the assassination takes shape.